diff options
| author | Amlal El Mahrouss <amlal@nekernel.org> | 2026-01-30 20:12:02 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Amlal El Mahrouss <amlal@nekernel.org> | 2026-01-30 20:12:02 +0100 |
| commit | 9a5839719867e779eefc3cf11654bc1032232fd3 (patch) | |
| tree | 611158ecce369b969462796467ed29335b548ae0 /source | |
| parent | 1018d8f0626f6fc0be8d101e100b8ae9a28a36cf (diff) | |
chore: some paper updates.
Signed-off-by: Amlal El Mahrouss <amlal@nekernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'source')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/README.md | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | source/wg03/wg03.tex | 17 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | source/wg05/tn/tn001.05.tex | 6 |
3 files changed, 16 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/source/README.md b/source/README.md index 8e81443..042ae8f 100644 --- a/source/README.md +++ b/source/README.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ - WG01: `PL/OS Group`. - WG02: `Systems Group`. -- WG03: `Compiler Design Group`. +- WG03: `Nectar Group`. - WG04-SPACE-RF: `Distributed Systems Group`. -- WG05: `Execution Semantics Theory Group`. +- WG05: `Execution Theory Group`. diff --git a/source/wg03/wg03.tex b/source/wg03/wg03.tex index 19accb6..34ac08c 100644 --- a/source/wg03/wg03.tex +++ b/source/wg03/wg03.tex @@ -74,20 +74,25 @@ const main() \begin{lstlisting} $ Hello, world! -\end{lstlisting} And return $written$, now defined as $W$, upon completion. Such program that we denote as $\Theta$ may be noted as: +\end{lstlisting} And return variant $written$, now defined as $W$, upon completion. Such program that we denote as $\Theta$ may be defined as: \begin{equation} \Theta(x) = \lambda x.(P(x)) -\end{equation} Where $P(x)$ is $P$ with an argument of $x$. - +\end{equation} Where $P(x)$ is $P$ with an argument of $x$. \\ Let $\Theta(x)$ be defined as the $\lambda$-Execution of a program $P$. \section{References} \begin{enumerate} - \item NeKernel.org (2026), \href{https://nekernel.org/nekernel}{https://nekernel.org} - \item NeKernel.org Primer (2026), \href{https://nekernel.org/nectar\_primer.html}{https://nekernel.org/nectar\_primer.html} - \item El Mahrouss, A. (2026). The Execution Semantics: On Axioms, Domains, and Authority. (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18362375 + \item NeKernel.org (2026), \href{https://nekernel.org/nekernel}{https://nekernel.org} + \item NeKernel.org Primer (2026), \href{https://nekernel.org/nectar\_primer.html}{https://nekernel.org/nectar\_primer.html} + \item El Mahrouss, A. (2026). The Execution Semantics: On Axioms, Domains, and Authority. (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18362375 \item El Mahrouss, A. (2026). The Mathematics of Execution. Zenodo. \\https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18399140 \item Church, A. (1936). An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory. American Journal of Mathematics, 58(2), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/2371045 \end{enumerate} +\section{Definitions} + + \item Nectar: A compiled systems programming language—currently studied in this paper. + \item $\lambda$-Execution: Formally defined as: $\Theta(x) = \lambda x.(P(x))$. + \item $W$: The return variant—an $\lambda$-Execution variable based on the $\lambda$-Execution result. + \end{document} diff --git a/source/wg05/tn/tn001.05.tex b/source/wg05/tn/tn001.05.tex index dba4083..176f22a 100644 --- a/source/wg05/tn/tn001.05.tex +++ b/source/wg05/tn/tn001.05.tex @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ We will define their concepts alongside their properties. We assume the reader h Let $\Gamma(x, y, z)$ be an execution product of variable arguments $x$, $y$, $z$ defined in compatible and composable execution context $E$: \\ Let the index $\alpha$ denote the current execution domain of an execution product. -Let the following formula: +\\ Let the following formula: \begin{equation} -\Gamma(x, y, z) = \prod_{\alpha=1}^{n}(x_{\alpha} \times y_{\alpha} \times z_{\alpha})+C. +\Gamma(x, y, z) = \prod_{\alpha=1}^{n}(x_{\alpha} \times y_{\alpha} \times z_{\alpha})+C \end{equation} Be defined as the execution product. Where $C$ is the Unknown Execution of $\Gamma(x, y, z)$—now defined as $g(E)$. @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Let $N$ be defined as $\varnothing$. \section{Conclusion} -Such concepts and properties are essential for `Execution Theory''s formality as per defined in El Mahrouss, A. (2026)' paper. +Such properties are essential to define `Execution Theory''s as a mathematical construct as per defined in El Mahrouss, A.' paper. \section{References} |
